________________________________ From: lfs-support <[email protected]> on behalf of Douglas R. Reno <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2020 2:20 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Glibc-2.31 issues
On 2/16/20 7:38 AM, Pierre Labastie wrote: > Le 14/02/2020 à 23:43, TomW a écrit : >> On 2/7/20 3:23 PM, Douglas R. Reno wrote: >>> >>> On 2/6/20 1:05 PM, Tom Willhite wrote: >>>> Just a heads up FYI. I failed to build latest systemd-svn using a 1 month >>>> old tools tball by hand. Systemd-244 ninja got to machinectl and errored >>>> out. So I fired up a jhalfs build using latest svn version of it and that >>>> built ok but upon first boot I get ncsd systemd service not starting. >>>> Obviously the book needs some mods. I can create a /var/run/ncsd and >>>> start the service but it isn't enough to make it function. Anything >>>> network related is broke like ssh and resolved. I won't clutter up this >>>> post with exact errors because you will run into it all soon and see it >>>> yourselves. New toolchain stuff....gotta expect some of this I >>>> suppose. Archetech >>> Hi Archetech, >>> >>> >>> I wanted to let you know that I've begun looking into this (I'm running >>> jhalfs on my 32-bit and 64-bit systems because one of them could be affected >>> by a time_t bug, and the other one is likely to have the glibc problems that >>> you're reporting). >>> >>> >>> This will be my first system with glibc-2.31, so I'll likely have to run >>> through a portion of BLFS to test the patch with glibc-2.31 as well (I might >>> do this on my 32-bit machine because it takes longer to build than anything >>> else, and I like to start that one ahead of package freeze anyway). >>> >>> >>> From the v244-stable repository, it looks like systemd may need fixes for >>> BTRFS/LVM2 filesystems, as well as some patches for libcap-2.29+ (can >>> someone check on that please? libcap-2.29+, linux-5.5, and glibc-2.31 seems >>> to be causing problems for at least hwdb if not udev itself based off what >>> I've seen in the systemd stable repository). >>> >>> >>> The PolicyKit security vulnerability is also fixed in the stable repository >>> as well, so I'll backport that too. >>> >>> >>> Thank you for reporting, >>> >>> >>> - Doug >>> >>> >> I tried reinstalling systemd per the blfs book and it makes no improvement. >> The build errors right after it processes udev.pc and gives eof being off. >> Got any ideas on how to repair? >> >> I tested the toolchain and it seems ok. >> >> > Just FYI, I'm currently building systemd BLFS SVN on top of systemd LFS > 9.1-rc1, And I see none of the errors you are talking about. > > But I've had some similar problems (solved) with systemd+jhalfs a while ago, > see http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/12595#comment:6 and > following... > > Pierre I've now built systemd-244 in BLFS with all dependencies except Qemu, iptables, cryptsetup, and zsh (I don't normally build those, except for cryptsetup, and that comes later). I didn't have any problems booting the machine or building the package. Archetech, which optional dependencies do you have installed, and which ones do you not have installed? Also, make sure that you have seccomp support enabled in your kernel please -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style I rebuilt with jhalfs 3 after no timely answer here . This build is ok and I'm up to building X on it. Curious to know what fixed it. I assume jhalfs was updated after this post was made but no one was told in this thread what got done exactly. So all good so far.
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
