Le 20/02/2020 à 22:16, Pierre Labastie a écrit : > Le 20/02/2020 à 19:58, Tom Willhite a écrit : >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *From:* lfs-support <[email protected]> on >> behalf >> of Douglas R. Reno <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 18, 2020 2:20 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> <[email protected]> >> *Subject:* Re: [lfs-support] Glibc-2.31 issues >> >> >> On 2/16/20 7:38 AM, Pierre Labastie wrote: >>> Le 14/02/2020 à 23:43, TomW a écrit : >>>> On 2/7/20 3:23 PM, Douglas R. Reno wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 2/6/20 1:05 PM, Tom Willhite wrote: >>>>>> Just a heads up FYI. I failed to build latest systemd-svn using a 1 >>>>>> month >>>>>> old tools tball by hand. Systemd-244 ninja got to machinectl and >>>>>> errored >>>>>> out. So I fired up a jhalfs build using latest svn version of it and >>>>>> that >>>>>> built ok but upon first boot I get ncsd systemd service not starting. >>>>>> Obviously the book needs some mods. I can create a /var/run/ncsd and >>>>>> start the service but it isn't enough to make it function. Anything >>>>>> network related is broke like ssh and resolved. I won't clutter up this >>>>>> post with exact errors because you will run into it all soon and see it >>>>>> yourselves. New toolchain stuff....gotta expect some of this I >>>>>> suppose. Archetech >>>>> Hi Archetech, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I wanted to let you know that I've begun looking into this (I'm running >>>>> jhalfs on my 32-bit and 64-bit systems because one of them could be >>>>> affected >>>>> by a time_t bug, and the other one is likely to have the glibc problems >>>>> that >>>>> you're reporting). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This will be my first system with glibc-2.31, so I'll likely have to run >>>>> through a portion of BLFS to test the patch with glibc-2.31 as well (I >>>>> might >>>>> do this on my 32-bit machine because it takes longer to build than >>>>> anything >>>>> else, and I like to start that one ahead of package freeze anyway). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> From the v244-stable repository, it looks like systemd may need fixes >>>>> for >>>>> BTRFS/LVM2 filesystems, as well as some patches for libcap-2.29+ (can >>>>> someone check on that please? libcap-2.29+, linux-5.5, and glibc-2.31 >>>>> seems >>>>> to be causing problems for at least hwdb if not udev itself based off what >>>>> I've seen in the systemd stable repository). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The PolicyKit security vulnerability is also fixed in the stable >>>>> repository >>>>> as well, so I'll backport that too. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thank you for reporting, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> - Doug >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I tried reinstalling systemd per the blfs book and it makes no improvement. >>>> The build errors right after it processes udev.pc and gives eof being off. >>>> Got any ideas on how to repair? >>>> >>>> I tested the toolchain and it seems ok. >>>> >>>> >>> Just FYI, I'm currently building systemd BLFS SVN on top of systemd LFS >>> 9.1-rc1, And I see none of the errors you are talking about. >>> >>> But I've had some similar problems (solved) with systemd+jhalfs a while ago, >>> see http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/12595#comment:6 and >>> following... >>> >>> Pierre >> >> >> I rebuilt with jhalfs 3 after no timely answer here . This build is ok and >> I'm up to building X on it. >> Curious to know what fixed it. I assume jhalfs was updated after this post >> was made but no one was told in this thread what got done exactly. So all >> good so far. >> > > After the first post of this thread, the only thing that was done with jhalfs > was to adapt to new xml idrefs that were changed in the lfs book (trying to be > consistent in naming things). That seems fairly unrelated to what was in the > OP. >
BTW, what do you call "jhalfs 3". Don't you mean jhalfs svn? Pierre -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
