On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 03:42:14PM -0500, Mark Dymek wrote:
> so i'm stuck at adjusting the toolchain ld-new is missing so making a
> link to /tools/bin fails. i found a previous email about this and it
> seems like the advice was to ignore it? this message was from 2006 is
> that still safe to do? how would i go about build ld-new?
>
That sounds like bad advice (might work, might keep you relying on
/tools even after LFS is finished).
ld-new comes from binutils pass2 (after 'make install').
But you are now in a position where you might want to keep what you
have in /tools. Some people may tell you that the correct procedure
is to start over and "Follow Book, Book Good" (i.e. don't omit
anything). But if this was your only omission, perhaps you could do
something like this after exiting from chroot AND from user lfs -
As root, probably:
mv -v /mnt/lfs/tools /mnt/lfs/tools.good
mkdir /mnt/lfs/tools, repeat setting up the environment, and again as user
lfs (in a fresh session) do everything up to the end of binutils
pass2. Exit from user lfs.
Then, as root:
cp -v /mnt/lfs/tools/bin/ld-new to /mnt/lfs/tools.good/bin/ld-new
mv -v /mnt/lfs/tools{,.minimal}
mv -v /mnt/lfs/tools{.good,}
ls -l /mnt/lfs/tools/bin/ld-new
If ok , reenter chroot.
Not tested, I might very well be missing something.
If you have a fast machine, I would be inclined to just start over
and pay attention to all the instructions in each package.
ĸen
--
We hope and trust that our valued and loyal customers will bear with
us in the coming months as we interact synergistically with change
management in our striving for excellence. That is our mission.
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
