When running the check, I see errors reported about missing libgcc_s.so.1 ``` make[5]: *** [Makefile:9399: gdb_index_test_1] Error 1 make[5]: Target 'gdb_index_test_1.stdout' not remade because of errors. `echo g++ -W -Wall -Wstack-usage=262144 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -fmerge-constants -g -O2 -fno-use-linker-plugin -o gdb_index_test_2 | sed -e 's/\([^ ]*\)\(.*\)/\1 -Bgcctestdir\/\2/' -e 's/-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=[0-9][0-9]*//'` -Wl,--gdb-index gdb_index_test_cdebug.o gcctestdir/collect-ld: error: cannot open /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu/10.2.0/../../../../lib/libgcc_s.so: No such file or directory gcctestdir/collect-ld: error: cannot open /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu/10.2.0/../../../../lib/libgcc_s.so: No such file or directory collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status make[5]: *** [Makefile:9405: gdb_index_test_2] Error 1 ```
So I checked the directory layout and usr/lib/libgcc_s.so does exist. However, it's a pointer to: `readlink libgcc_s.so` produces: `/tools/lib/libgcc_s.so` Navigating to /tools/lib: ``` (lfs chroot) root:/tools/lib# ls gcc libcc1.la libcc1.so libcc1.so.0 libcc1.so.0.0.0 ``` Why might this setup be occuring?
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
