On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 11:46:23AM -0600, Alexander Brassel wrote: > When running the check, I see errors reported about missing libgcc_s.so.1 > > ``` > make[5]: *** [Makefile:9399: gdb_index_test_1] Error 1 > make[5]: Target 'gdb_index_test_1.stdout' not remade because of errors. > `echo g++ -W -Wall -Wstack-usage=262144 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -fmerge-constants -g -O2 -fno-use-linker-plugin -o > gdb_index_test_2 | sed -e 's/\([^ ]*\)\(.*\)/\1 -Bgcctestdir\/\2/' -e > 's/-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=[0-9][0-9]*//'` -Wl,--gdb-index > gdb_index_test_cdebug.o > gcctestdir/collect-ld: error: cannot open > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu/10.2.0/../../../../lib/libgcc_s.so: No > such file or directory > gcctestdir/collect-ld: error: cannot open > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu/10.2.0/../../../../lib/libgcc_s.so: No > such file or directory > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > make[5]: *** [Makefile:9405: gdb_index_test_2] Error 1 > ``` > > So I checked the directory layout and usr/lib/libgcc_s.so does exist. > However, it's a pointer to: > > `readlink libgcc_s.so` > produces: `/tools/lib/libgcc_s.so` > > Navigating to /tools/lib: > ``` > (lfs chroot) root:/tools/lib# ls > gcc libcc1.la libcc1.so libcc1.so.0 libcc1.so.0.0.0 > ``` > > Why might this setup be occuring?
The libgcc_s files should have been installed in $LFS/usr in gcc pass 2 at the end of chapter 6. $LFS should be /mnt/lfs. The only packages installed in /mnt/lfs/tools are binutils pass 1 and gcc pass 1. No idea why yours is different, but I wonder if you have passed 'tools' to a different package (before 10.0 we put a lot of things in tools, now we DESTDIR to $LFS/usr). ĸen -- The people next door oppress me all night long. I tell them: I work all day, a man's got to have some time to learn to play the tuba. That's oppression, that is. [ Guards! Guards! ] -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
