Please help me to test my glibc workaround in this thread. If it works, crt1.o should have no "needed" ISA markers (even x86-64-baseline should not be there). Then we can add it as a note in the book.
If it was on binutils sid, it should be diagnosticed already in the editors' builds. We use -march in GMP and libffi so their test suites would immediately fail, if it was a binutils issue.
I think it's not glibc devs, just other packagers or distro maintainers like us thought it was a binutils issue. I actually left a wrong comment in the BZ. No way to delete it :(.
Sorry again for the bad formatting on my phone.
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
