Luca Barbato <[email protected]> writes: > On 04/15/2011 12:45 AM, Måns Rullgård wrote: >>> The idea isn't bad, I'd like to have the opinion of window users. >> >> I think it is a stupid idea, just like Windows in the first place. > > Sadly windows is stupid, the idea of converting the name from utf8 to > utf16 and pass it the the right open variant is sound. Having it as > separate protocol probably is overkill and could be done directly in the > normal file protocol.
The problem is that the filename passed in is in some unknown encoding. >> If an OS refuses to support unicode filenames in a sane way, its >> users will simply have to accept not having that feature. End of story. > > If the workaround is just 10 lines that could be cleanly compiled w/out > touching the rest of the code isn't that bad. People have tried to solve it cleanly before, and failed. -- Måns Rullgård [email protected] _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
