Martin Storsjö <[email protected]> writes: > On Fri, 22 Apr 2011, Måns Rullgård wrote: > >> "Ronald S. Bultje" <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Martin Storsjö <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Setting this should fix the FATE build failure on DragonFly BSD, >> >> since inet_aton only is visible if __BSD_VISIBLE is set. >> >> >> >> Alternatively, a line defining __BSD_VISIBLE=1 could be >> >> added at the top of os_support.c. For FreeBSD, similar lines >> >> are required in libavdevice/bktr.c and libavdevice/oss_audio.c, too. >> >> --- >> >> doc/general.texi | 4 ++-- >> >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> > >> > Can't we detect BSD subtype automatically and set __BSD_VISIBLE=1 >> > directly? Mans/Diego? >> >> __BSD_VISIBLE should not be set directly, IIRC. _BSD_SOURCE is the >> correct symbol to define. This can be done with add_cppflags -D_BSD_SOURCE >> in the relevant OS sections in configure. > > Yes, the *_VISIBLE macros sound like things that shouldn't be set > manually. Nevertheless, defining _BSD_SOURCE isn't enough for getting the > inet_aton prototype on DragonFly at least.
Then find the right thing to define. -- Måns Rullgård [email protected] _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
