On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote: > On 4/29/11 8:30 PM, Diogo Franco wrote: >> >> FreeBSD, unlike (whatever OS the default -D are trying to fix), >> defines every symbol by default; conformance defines are supposed to >> restrict FreeBSD's definitions to only the requested specification. >> >> Undeffing the flags prevents them from disabling __BSD_VISIBLE, which >> is only defined when no conformance flags are defined. It should not be >> defined by the user. > > seems sort of a solution, even if would be great if upstream would provide a > way to require just the features needed as it happens on the rest of the > world... >
In the past I've considered the concept of a "--disable-maintainer-mode" flag to be far less strict about this sort of thing. _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
