On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:58:44PM -0700, Aℓex Converse wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 4/29/11 8:30 PM, Diogo Franco wrote: > >> > >> FreeBSD, unlike (whatever OS the default -D are trying to fix), > >> defines every symbol by default; conformance defines are supposed to > >> restrict FreeBSD's definitions to only the requested specification. > >> > >> Undeffing the flags prevents them from disabling __BSD_VISIBLE, which > >> is only defined when no conformance flags are defined. It should not be > >> defined by the user. > > > > seems sort of a solution, even if would be great if upstream would provide a > > way to require just the features needed as it happens on the rest of the > > world... > > In the past I've considered the concept of a > "--disable-maintainer-mode" flag to be far less strict about this sort > of thing.
I'm not following, could you elaborate what you would want such a mode to accomplish and how? Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
