Hi, On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Ronald S. Bultje <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Ronald S. Bultje <[email protected]> wrote: >> 2 threads, prefetch on >> real 0m6.289s >> real 0m6.299s >> real 0m6.406s >> >> 2 threads, prefetch on with thread_wait >> real 0m6.361s >> real 0m6.353s >> real 0m6.392s >> >> So a little slowdown on 2 threads, oddly, but I'll leave it anyway. > > Actually, thinking about this some more, since prefetch is "advice" > anyway, doesn't this mean I should leave out the > ff_thread_await_progress()? Alexander, Jason, Loren, any opinions?
No answers, so I've removed it in this patch iteration. Other comments addressed, should be committable whenever. Ronald
0001-vp8-frame-multithreading.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
