Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes:

> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 09:32:26AM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>> Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes:
>> > --- a/tests/Makefile
>> > +++ b/tests/Makefile
>> > @@ -41,16 +41,8 @@ tests/seek_test$(EXESUF): tests/seek_test.o 
>> > $(FF_DEP_LIBS)
>> >
>> > -include $(SRC_PATH)/tests/fate.mak
>> > -include $(SRC_PATH)/tests/fate2.mak
>> > -
>> > -include $(SRC_PATH)/tests/fate/aac.mak
>> > -include $(SRC_PATH)/tests/fate/als.mak
>> > -include $(SRC_PATH)/tests/fate/fft.mak
>> > -include $(SRC_PATH)/tests/fate/h264.mak
>> > -include $(SRC_PATH)/tests/fate/mp3.mak
>> > -include $(SRC_PATH)/tests/fate/vorbis.mak
>> > -include $(SRC_PATH)/tests/fate/vp8.mak
>> > +include $(SRC_PATH)/tests/*.mak
>> > +include $(SRC_PATH)/tests/fate/*.mak
>> 
>> Still rejected for the same reasons already explained.
>
> IIUC you are afraid that some file matching the pattern might
> accidentally end up in one of those directories.  I doubt that
> such a situation can really arise accidentally.

You'd be surprised.  Besides, most of those should be made conditional
on the respective codecs so a build with parts disabled can still be
tested.

Stop sending this patch.  I will not approve it.

-- 
Måns Rullgård
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to