On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:40:43AM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 11:21:22PM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> >> Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes:
> >> 
> >> > ---
> >> >  Makefile             |    3 ++-
> >> >  libavfilter/Makefile |    3 ++-
> >> >  libavformat/Makefile |    1 +
> >> >  subdir.mak           |    4 ++--
> >> >  tests/Makefile       |    3 ---
> >> >  5 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> An alternative to this would be moving seek_test to libavformat/
> >> There is some logic that as well.
> >
> > I disagree here.  It's convenient to have the seek_test line in the
> > libavformat/ Makefile because it's the simplest way to construct the
> > correct link command.  But logically seek_test is no more part of
> > libavformat itself than some of the programs from tools/ that link
> > against it.
> 
> What about all the other *-test programs?

They are not part of the FATE infrastructure, unlike seek_test.
This is moving into bikeshed territory.  Can I please just push
this now and be done with it?  If you want to move files further
around, be my guest afterwards.

Diego
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to