Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:40:43AM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote: >> Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 11:21:22PM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote: >> >> Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes: >> >> >> >> > --- >> >> > Makefile | 3 ++- >> >> > libavfilter/Makefile | 3 ++- >> >> > libavformat/Makefile | 1 + >> >> > subdir.mak | 4 ++-- >> >> > tests/Makefile | 3 --- >> >> > 5 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >> >> >> >> An alternative to this would be moving seek_test to libavformat/ >> >> There is some logic that as well. >> > >> > I disagree here. It's convenient to have the seek_test line in the >> > libavformat/ Makefile because it's the simplest way to construct the >> > correct link command. But logically seek_test is no more part of >> > libavformat itself than some of the programs from tools/ that link >> > against it. >> >> What about all the other *-test programs? > > They are not part of the FATE infrastructure,
Sure they are. Many of them are run as part of FATE, and I intend to add as many of the remainder as possible. What are they for if not for testing? > unlike seek_test. This is moving into bikeshed territory. Can I > please just push this now and be done with it? No. > If you want to move files further around, be my guest afterwards. You're making further cleanup difficult by making the mess bigger. -- Måns Rullgård [email protected] _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
