On date Saturday 2011-07-30 12:13:48 +0200, Luca Barbato encoded: > On 7/29/11 8:03 PM, Stefano Sabatini wrote: > >If you want to rename the tools just do them consistent: > >avprobe > >avplay > >so the pattern here is av+VERB > > > >avconvert/avmux is consistent with this pattern, avconvert looks a > >more intuitive name. > > I'd rather name it just "av" the name is available and the shorter > the better. I do agree that avconv/avconvert is more intuitive but > mux seems to cover better what av.c should provide.
av => unexplicative avmux => the tool muxes, but it's not the only thing that the tool does, "avconvert" explicates better what the tool does (convert A/V/S streams). On the same ground, maybe ffserver => av+stream, "server" doesn't tell what the tool does. _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
