On 7/30/11 1:25 PM, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
On date Saturday 2011-07-30 12:13:48 +0200, Luca Barbato encoded:
On 7/29/11 8:03 PM, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
If you want to rename the tools just do them consistent:
avprobe
avplay
so the pattern here is av+VERB
avconvert/avmux is consistent with this pattern, avconvert looks a
more intuitive name.
I'd rather name it just "av" the name is available and the shorter
the better. I do agree that avconv/avconvert is more intuitive but
mux seems to cover better what av.c should provide.
av => unexplicative
I know, but gives you the idea "does stuff on audio video" like "ip"
does stuff on the ip protocol.
avmux => the tool muxes, but it's not the only thing that the tool
does, "avconvert" explicates better what the tool does (convert A/V/S
streams).
Indeed both cover just a side of it.
On the same ground, maybe ffserver => av+stream, "server" doesn't tell
what the tool does.
avserver tells us that the program serves audio/video so might still be
easy to get.
lu
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
