On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 02:42:48PM +0000, Måns Rullgård wrote: > Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes: > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 02:26:29PM +0000, Måns Rullgård wrote: > >> Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes: > >> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 01:28:48PM +0000, Mans Rullgard wrote: > >> >> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <[email protected]> > >> >> --- > >> >> Makefile | 1 + > >> >> libavcodec/Makefile | 2 -- > >> >> libavdevice/Makefile | 2 -- > >> >> libavfilter/Makefile | 2 -- > >> >> libavformat/Makefile | 2 -- > >> >> libavutil/Makefile | 2 -- > >> >> libpostproc/Makefile | 2 -- > >> >> libswscale/Makefile | 2 -- > >> >> 8 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > >> > > >> > Nice - go ahead and push. > >> > > >> > Would you mind renaming subdir.mak to "template.mak" or > >> > "subdir_template.mak"? I think that describes the function > >> > and content of that file much better. > >> > >> I was thinking library.mak since it's all about libraries. > > > > library_template.mak? > > Do you have a particular infatuation with the word template?
It must be the same sentiment some people have towards chocolate and you towards snide remarks: just irresistible. I picked the name "template" up from you, who correctly reminded me that it really is a collection of rule templates. That said, I don't mind library.mak, it's better than subdir.mak. I'm fine with small iterative improvements even in cases where I'm convinced I know (and have) a better solution. Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
