Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 02:42:48PM +0000, Måns Rullgård wrote: >> Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes: >> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 02:26:29PM +0000, Måns Rullgård wrote: >> >> Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 01:28:48PM +0000, Mans Rullgard wrote: >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <[email protected]> >> >> >> --- >> >> >> Makefile | 1 + >> >> >> libavcodec/Makefile | 2 -- >> >> >> libavdevice/Makefile | 2 -- >> >> >> libavfilter/Makefile | 2 -- >> >> >> libavformat/Makefile | 2 -- >> >> >> libavutil/Makefile | 2 -- >> >> >> libpostproc/Makefile | 2 -- >> >> >> libswscale/Makefile | 2 -- >> >> >> 8 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) >> >> > >> >> > Nice - go ahead and push. >> >> > >> >> > Would you mind renaming subdir.mak to "template.mak" or >> >> > "subdir_template.mak"? I think that describes the function >> >> > and content of that file much better. >> >> >> >> I was thinking library.mak since it's all about libraries. >> > >> > library_template.mak? >> >> Do you have a particular infatuation with the word template? > > It must be the same sentiment some people have towards chocolate and > you towards snide remarks: just irresistible. > > I picked the name "template" up from you, who correctly reminded me > that it really is a collection of rule templates.
I suggested using template in the names of such C files to set them aside from regular C files which are not templates. Makefiles, on the other hand, are inherently template-like in nature, so there is no need to further identify them as such. -- Måns Rullgård [email protected] _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
