On 12/16/11, Maans Rullgaard <[email protected]> wrote: > Paul B Mahol <[email protected]> writes: > >> --- >> libavcodec/cljr.c | 6 +++--- >> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/libavcodec/cljr.c b/libavcodec/cljr.c >> index a5ee738..199fd98 100644 >> --- a/libavcodec/cljr.c >> +++ b/libavcodec/cljr.c >> @@ -57,9 +57,9 @@ static int decode_frame(AVCodecContext *avctx, >> if (p->data[0]) >> avctx->release_buffer(avctx, p); >> >> - if (buf_size / avctx->height < avctx->width) { >> - av_log(avctx, AV_LOG_ERROR, >> - "Resolution larger than buffer size. Invalid header?\n"); >> + if (buf_size != avctx->height * avctx->width) { >> + av_log(avctx, AV_LOG_ERROR, "got a buffer with %d bytes when %d >> were expected\n", >> + buf_size, avctx->height * avctx->width); > > These checks are not equivalent, the old version allowing an oversized > input packet. Is this change intentional?
Oversized input packets can not be considered valid packets. I do not know of any samples which would have extra bits. _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
