Paul B Mahol <[email protected]> writes: > On 12/16/11, Maans Rullgaard <[email protected]> wrote: >> Paul B Mahol <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> --- >>> libavcodec/cljr.c | 6 +++--- >>> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/libavcodec/cljr.c b/libavcodec/cljr.c >>> index a5ee738..199fd98 100644 >>> --- a/libavcodec/cljr.c >>> +++ b/libavcodec/cljr.c >>> @@ -57,9 +57,9 @@ static int decode_frame(AVCodecContext *avctx, >>> if (p->data[0]) >>> avctx->release_buffer(avctx, p); >>> >>> - if (buf_size / avctx->height < avctx->width) { >>> - av_log(avctx, AV_LOG_ERROR, >>> - "Resolution larger than buffer size. Invalid header?\n"); >>> + if (buf_size != avctx->height * avctx->width) { >>> + av_log(avctx, AV_LOG_ERROR, "got a buffer with %d bytes when %d >>> were expected\n", >>> + buf_size, avctx->height * avctx->width); >> >> These checks are not equivalent, the old version allowing an oversized >> input packet. Is this change intentional? > > Oversized input packets can not be considered valid packets.
Of course they can, if they start with a valid packet. -- Måns Rullgård [email protected] _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
