Sean McGovern <[email protected]> writes: > On Tuesday, December 20, 2011, Mans Rullgard <[email protected]> wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <[email protected]> >> --- >> configure | 1 + >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/configure b/configure >> index 22542af..672ed31 100755 >> --- a/configure >> +++ b/configure >> @@ -3116,6 +3116,7 @@ elif enabled gcc; then >> check_cflags -fno-tree-vectorize >> check_cflags -Werror=implicit-function-declaration >> check_cflags -Werror=missing-prototypes >> + check_cflags -Werror=declaration-after-statement >> elif enabled llvm_gcc; then >> check_cflags -mllvm -stack-alignment=16 >> elif enabled clang; then >> -- > > Not opposed to this in principle, but can it wait until we decide what to > do with libpostproc? It will break the ppc{32,64} build as the altivec code > in postproc has a ton of these C90 violations.
I noticed. -- Måns Rullgård [email protected] _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
