"Ronald S. Bultje" <[email protected]> writes:

> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Mike Melanson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:00:06PM +0100, Aneesh Dogra wrote:
>>>>
>>>> --- a/tests/fate.mak
>>>> +++ b/tests/fate.mak
>>>> @@ -246,5 +246,5 @@ FATE_TESTS += fate-westwood-aud
>>>>  fate-westwood-aud: CMD = md5  -i $(SAMPLES)/westwood-aud/excellent.aud
>>>> -f s16le
>>>>  FATE_TESTS += fate-wnv1
>>>>  fate-wnv1: CMD = framecrc  -i $(SAMPLES)/wnv1/wnv1-codec.avi -an
>>>> -FATE_TESTS += fate-xan-dpcm
>>>> -fate-xan-dpcm: CMD = md5  -i $(SAMPLES)/wc4-xan/wc4_2.avi -vn -f s16le
>>>> +FATE_TESTS += fate-dpcm_xan_audio
>>>> +fate-dpcm_xan_audio: CMD = md5  -i $(SAMPLES)/wc4-xan/wc4_2.avi -vn -f
>>>> s16le
>>>
>>> This renaming is nonsense, dpcm is clearly audio.
>>>
>>>> --- a/tests/fate2.mak
>>>> +++ b/tests/fate2.mak
>>>> @@ -87,3 +87,6 @@ fate-v410enc: CMD = md5 -f image2 -vcodec pgmyuv -i
>>>> $(TARGET_PATH)/tests/vsynth1
>>>>
>>>>  FATE_TESTS += fate-r210
>>>>  fate-r210: CMD = framecrc -i $(SAMPLES)/r210/r210.avi -pix_fmt rgb48le
>>>> +
>>>> +FATE_TESTS += fate-xxan_wc4_video
>>>> +fate-xxan_wc4_video: CMD = framecrc -i $(SAMPLES)/wc4-xan/wc4_2.avi -an
>>>> -vframes 10
>>>
>>> Same here, no _video suffix is necessary.
>>
>> Moreover, while we're in the refactoring mood, these 2 tests should really
>> just be combined (fate-dpcm_xan_audio and fate-xxan_wc4_video). They both
>> operate on the same file. I suspect things got this way because we had the
>> audio decoder before the video decoder.
>
> Mans suggested we separate video and audio tests for this particular
> case earlier in the review thread.

I suggest separating audio and video in all tests.  When something
breaks, it is much easier to see at a glance where the problem is.

-- 
Måns Rullgård
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to