Justin Ruggles <[email protected]> wrote:

>On 12/30/2011 05:28 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>
>> 
>> 
>> Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 02:06:03AM +0530, Gaurav Narula wrote:
>>>>
>>>> --- a/tests/fate-run.sh
>>>> +++ b/tests/fate-run.sh
>>>> @@ -69,6 +69,14 @@ md5(){
>>>>  
>>>> +pcm24(){
>>>> +    avconv "$@" -vn -f s24le -
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +pcm32(){
>>>> +    avconv "$@" -vn -f s32le -
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>>  pcm(){
>>>>      avconv "$@" -vn -f s16le -
>>>>  }
>>>
>>> This is not a test for a 302M decoder, it's infrastructure for
>testing
>>> 24 and 32 bit PCM in FATE.  It's very welcome, but you need to split
>>> this patch into two pieces.
>> 
>> I'm afraid there's more to it than that. Please don't commit this
>until I've had a closer look.
>
>
>This should work fine if the test uses CMP = diff. The oneoff tests
>obviously won't work until we add 24-bit and 32-bit support in
>tiny_psnr.

PCM tests should not use CMP=diff for a host of reasons.

-- 
Måns Rullgård
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to