Hi,

On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Justin Ruggles
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On 12/30/2011 05:28 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 02:06:03AM +0530, Gaurav Narula wrote:
>>>>
>>>> --- a/tests/fate-run.sh
>>>> +++ b/tests/fate-run.sh
>>>> @@ -69,6 +69,14 @@ md5(){
>>>>
>>>> +pcm24(){
>>>> +    avconv "$@" -vn -f s24le -
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +pcm32(){
>>>> +    avconv "$@" -vn -f s32le -
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>>  pcm(){
>>>>      avconv "$@" -vn -f s16le -
>>>>  }
>>>
>>> This is not a test for a 302M decoder, it's infrastructure for testing
>>> 24 and 32 bit PCM in FATE.  It's very welcome, but you need to split
>>> this patch into two pieces.
>>
>> I'm afraid there's more to it than that. Please don't commit this until I've 
>> had a closer look.
>
>
> This should work fine if the test uses CMP = diff. The oneoff tests
> obviously won't work until we add 24-bit and 32-bit support in tiny_psnr.
[..]
            if(len==2){
                a= (int16_t)(a | (buf[0][++j]<<8));
                b= (int16_t)(b | (buf[1][  j]<<8));
            }

Can't be that difficult to change that to a loop...

Ronald
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to