On 02/01/12 14:35, Anton Khirnov wrote:
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 13:19:41 +0000, Måns Rullgård<[email protected]> wrote:
Can't argue with that, but it's not the only option. For example,
dropping the buffersrc part (rendering avfilter_add_frame()) would make
sense.
This would make it inconsistent with the av_buffersrc_buffer() function
which I've managed to sneak past you just recently.
We might devote some time to reshape the global API for the 0.9 I guess.
The whole notion of exposing this as a filter to the caller is a bit
weird since it is the only way of feeding data into the system.
Strictly speaking there's also this thing called vsrc_movie, but yeah,
pretending it doesn't exist is better.
We might decide what to do about it, ideally avfi could enjoy having a
single, low level source function.
lu
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
