Hi, On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Reinhard Tartler <[email protected]> wrote: > 2012/1/9 Måns Rullgård <[email protected]>: >> "Ronald S. Bultje" <[email protected]> writes: >>> 2012/1/9 Måns Rullgård <[email protected]>: >>>> "Ronald S. Bultje" <[email protected]> writes: >>>> >>>>> I'll eventually move this code to yasm and it will disappear. All >>>>> inputs are done, only output and this fast-scaler is left, so it won't >>>>> be awfully long. >>>> >>>> That argument goes both ways. >>> >>> Agreed - I'm just trying to do it without losing functionality, no >>> matter how brief. >> >> Since it doesn't currently work, there is no loss of functionality. > > It does work in 32bit. The proposed workaround makes it behave in > 64bit more similarly to the 32bit (i.e., it doesn't crash). That's > quite an improvement. And given that it won't make porting to yasm any > harder, what are the drawbacks or problems with the hack?
Again, this isn't accurate. To the best of my knowledge, the 64bit code works fine until gcc-4.5 or gcc-4.6 (I forgot where it breaks). Only 4.6 or 4.7 breaks it. Ronald _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
