On 09/01/12 23:34, Diego Biurrun wrote:
Either way, the temporary workaround's benefit - not crashing with gcc 4.6+ - is IMO well worth the uglification that will go away shortly.
We are discussing broken code that will be removed or replaced soon. I'd go with that patch if it works. Otherwise I'd just disable that part since it is arguably useful.
lu -- Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
