On 20/01/12 15:27, Martin Storsjö wrote: > That's a very good question - not sure if avio_close() is intended to be > a "discard this and just close it quickly" function or a full graceful > close. At the moment, I don't think of any good reason why it shouldn't > flush by default when closing - I guess that we could get rid of a lot > of extra avio_flushes in each muxer if we changed this.
It had been reported already at least once on irc, and I already wanted to add the flush call in the close but I got sidetracked. Anybody against it? lu -- Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
