On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:27:53 -0800, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote: > On 20/01/12 15:27, Martin Storsjö wrote: > > That's a very good question - not sure if avio_close() is intended to be > > a "discard this and just close it quickly" function or a full graceful > > close. At the moment, I don't think of any good reason why it shouldn't > > flush by default when closing - I guess that we could get rid of a lot > > of extra avio_flushes in each muxer if we changed this. > > It had been reported already at least once on irc, and I already wanted > to add the flush call in the close but I got sidetracked. > > Anybody against it? >
I wondered why doesn't it flush as well, so fine with me. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
