On So, Jan 22, 2012 at 10:28:46 (CET), Anton Khirnov wrote: > 0.8 is finally out so we can start preparing the next major bump. Before > we can actually bump, there are still some issues to resolve:
I guess you want to bump the soname of libavcodec only. Is that correct? Could you please summarize the non-cosmetic benefits of this? >From my last Debian archive rebuilds, I've seen that there are still *a lot* of packages using deprecated APIs, and I fear that dropping them will cause a serious amount of work to get all upstreams updated. I'd therefore prefer to have some solid arguments ready before starting to argue with fellow package maintainers. Cheers, Reinhard -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
