Uoti Urpala <[email protected]> writes: > On Sun, 2012-01-22 at 10:28 +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote: >> AVFrame.age is also a recent deprecation, but for the user apps it only >> means dropping one line, so I think we should drop it. > > But isn't that line actually REQUIRED by all Libav versions until one > month ago? Meaning applications can't handle its removal by "only > dropping one line", if they want to support those Libav versions > (including the latest release, until the new one is actually out).
That field is ignored in the latest release. -- Måns Rullgård [email protected] _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
