Hi, On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Martin Storsjö <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 6 Apr 2012, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Martin Storsjö <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Some streams don't contain these. >>> --- >>> I also tried changing the code in ff_asf_get_packet to seek back >>> and try to restart with the assumption that there isn't any start >>> marker (the code with a FIXME remark), but it broke in various >>> odd cases, this seems to be a more straightforward solution >>> which shouldn't break the existing error tolerance/resync code. >>> >>> libavformat/asfdec.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++- >>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> >> Example of such a stream? > > > rtsp://208.86.19.32:8000/crtn is such a stream.
I remember from when I wrote this stuff that in general, ASF-in-RTSP doesn't need these markers at all anyway, and each RPT packet simply contains an ASF packet. My original implementation skipped that altogether and directly called parse_packet() instead of get_packet(). Maybe we should go back to that approach by default in ASF/RTSP? Ronald _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
