Hi, On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Ronald S. Bultje <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Martin Storsjö <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, 6 Apr 2012, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Martin Storsjö <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Some streams don't contain these. >>>> --- >>>> I also tried changing the code in ff_asf_get_packet to seek back >>>> and try to restart with the assumption that there isn't any start >>>> marker (the code with a FIXME remark), but it broke in various >>>> odd cases, this seems to be a more straightforward solution >>>> which shouldn't break the existing error tolerance/resync code. >>>> >>>> libavformat/asfdec.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++- >>>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> >>> Example of such a stream? >> >> >> rtsp://208.86.19.32:8000/crtn is such a stream. > > I remember from when I wrote this stuff that in general, ASF-in-RTSP > doesn't need these markers at all anyway, and each RPT packet simply > contains an ASF packet. My original implementation skipped that > altogether and directly called parse_packet() instead of get_packet(). > Maybe we should go back to that approach by default in ASF/RTSP?
Behaviour, not approach, i.e. set this option to TRUE by default from the RTP/ASF parser. Ronald _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
