> Doesn't x86inc.asm already abstract these? So that you could use mulps > in both cases and end up with exactly what you have there?
I tried that and it didn't work. mulps appears to be setup correctly as an avx instruction in x86inc but I don't know enough about how x86inc works to figure out why it doesn't assemble. _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
