On 04/07/2012 07:43 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Kieran Kunhya <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Doesn't x86inc.asm already abstract these? So that you could use mulps >>> in both cases and end up with exactly what you have there? >> >> I tried that and it didn't work. mulps appears to be setup correctly >> as an avx instruction in x86inc but I don't know enough >> about how x86inc works to figure out why it doesn't assemble. > > Let's ask Jason/Loren/... - the whole idea is to abstract this stuff away.
using 3-arg mulps should work. -Justin _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
