On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:01:23PM -0700, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Jason Garrett-Glaser <[email protected]> wrote: > > I dislike this; just make the function mmx2. > > I'm supporting this sentiment, at least somewhat, as in "I'd prefer to > not add too many hacks for prehistoric cpus". Are there mmx-only cpus > (possibly from Intel) that do support cmov? Or does cmov support imply > sse/mmx2?
cmov support implies nothing of the sort. It appeared with the i686 architecture pioneered by the Pentium Pro, which did not even have MMX. Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
