Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes: > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:01:23PM -0700, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: >> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Jason Garrett-Glaser <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > I dislike this; just make the function mmx2. >> >> I'm supporting this sentiment, at least somewhat, as in "I'd prefer to >> not add too many hacks for prehistoric cpus". Are there mmx-only cpus >> (possibly from Intel) that do support cmov? Or does cmov support imply >> sse/mmx2? > > cmov support implies nothing of the sort. It appeared with the i686 > architecture pioneered by the Pentium Pro, which did not even have MMX.
And on the flip side, the original Pentium MMX did not have cmov. I don't think we particularly care about either of those CPUs though. -- Måns Rullgård [email protected] _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
