Hi, On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Måns Rullgård <[email protected]> wrote: > Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes: > >> libnut is known to be buggy and throw off the test results. >> --- >> tests/lavf-regression.sh | 3 ++- >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/tests/lavf-regression.sh b/tests/lavf-regression.sh >> index 6a6220b..2dbfdb4 100755 >> --- a/tests/lavf-regression.sh >> +++ b/tests/lavf-regression.sh >> @@ -99,7 +99,8 @@ do_lavf gxf "-ar 48000" "-r 25 -s pal -ac 1" >> fi >> >> if [ -n "$do_nut" ] ; then >> -do_lavf nut "" "-acodec mp2" >> +# Ensure our native NUT (de)muxer is used; libnut is known-buggy. >> +do_lavf nut "" "-acodec mp2 -f nut" "-f nut" >> fi > > Why do we support using libnut at all if it is buggy (whatever that > means for a format shrouded in such obscurity).
We were indeed discussing whether to drop it, waiting for Luca to say if he cares or not. Ronald _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
