On 20/05/12 14:45, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Måns Rullgård <[email protected]> wrote: >> Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> libnut is known to be buggy and throw off the test results. >>> --- >>> tests/lavf-regression.sh | 3 ++- >>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/tests/lavf-regression.sh b/tests/lavf-regression.sh >>> index 6a6220b..2dbfdb4 100755 >>> --- a/tests/lavf-regression.sh >>> +++ b/tests/lavf-regression.sh >>> @@ -99,7 +99,8 @@ do_lavf gxf "-ar 48000" "-r 25 -s pal -ac 1" >>> fi >>> >>> if [ -n "$do_nut" ] ; then >>> -do_lavf nut "" "-acodec mp2" >>> +# Ensure our native NUT (de)muxer is used; libnut is known-buggy. >>> +do_lavf nut "" "-acodec mp2 -f nut" "-f nut" >>> fi >> >> Why do we support using libnut at all if it is buggy (whatever that >> means for a format shrouded in such obscurity). > > We were indeed discussing whether to drop it, waiting for Luca to say > if he cares or not.
dropping libnut is fine, I'd like to revive nut sooner or later though. lu -- Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
