On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 01:38:06PM +0200, Christophe Gisquet wrote: > 2012/6/27 Jason Garrett-Glaser <[email protected]>: > > This should be REP_RET, but otherwise looks good. Will probably be faster, > > too. > > Yes, as mentioned by Mans, the memcpy provided by whatever mingw-w64 > uses (old msvcrt?) is not very fast: see cycle count in commit > message. > > But even with a better memcpy, it should be a win.
It should be a win without using _any_ memcpy at all :P SCNR _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
