On 7/27/2012 7:04 PM, Kostya Shishkov wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 06:49:44PM +0600, Mashiat Sarker Shakkhar wrote:
From: Michael Niedermayer <[email protected]>
Fixes read of uninitialized memory
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <[email protected]>
---
libavcodec/vc1dec.c | 2 +-
tests/ref/fate/vc1_sa10143 | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
Are you sure it's proper way to go or is it just a hack to get rid of some
warning?
I am not really sure. For interlaced field P blocks, the filtering
should be same as progressive - so this patch does not apply. On the
other hand, for interlaced frame blocks, the progressive filtering is
probably not right (we need to take fieldtx into account).
I would say, stick to what we know is right - hence filtering only
progressive blocks.
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
