On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 07:19:49PM +0600, Mashiat Sarker Shakkhar wrote: > On 7/27/2012 7:04 PM, Kostya Shishkov wrote: > >On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 06:49:44PM +0600, Mashiat Sarker Shakkhar wrote: > >>From: Michael Niedermayer <[email protected]> > >> > >>Fixes read of uninitialized memory > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <[email protected]> > >>--- > >> libavcodec/vc1dec.c | 2 +- > >> tests/ref/fate/vc1_sa10143 | 58 > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- > >> 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) > > > >Are you sure it's proper way to go or is it just a hack to get rid of some > >warning? > > I am not really sure. For interlaced field P blocks, the filtering > should be same as progressive - so this patch does not apply. On the > other hand, for interlaced frame blocks, the progressive filtering > is probably not right (we need to take fieldtx into account). > > I would say, stick to what we know is right - hence filtering only > progressive blocks.
May the section 10.10 be with you. _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
