On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:37:58PM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote: > Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes: > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:28:30PM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote: > >> Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes: > >> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 03:25:44AM +0100, Mans Rullgard wrote: > >> >> --- a/tests/Makefile > >> >> +++ b/tests/Makefile > >> >> @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ ENCDEC2 = $(call ALLYES, $(firstword $(1))_ENCODER > >> >> $(lastword $(1))_DECODER \ > >> >> $(firstword $(2))_ENCODER $(lastword > >> >> $(2))_DECODER \ > >> >> $(firstword $(3))_MUXER $(lastword > >> >> $(3))_DEMUXER) > >> >> > >> >> +DEMDEC = $(call ALLYES, $(1)_DEMUXER $(2:%=%_DECODER)) > >> > > >> > Now that I'm working on adding dependencies I keep getting confused by > >> > the differences in argument order between the macros. ENCDEC/ENCDEC2 > >> > has (de)muxers before en/decoders, for DEMDEC it is the other way > >> > around. > >> > > >> > I suggest changing ENCDEC/ENCDEC2 to have (de)muxers as first arguments > >> > as well. > >> > >> I suggest you suck it up or complain yesterday. > > > > I can still prepare a patch to change it and fix this internal API > > inconsistency.. We just need to decide which direction to change. > > Why don't you work on something that actually matters instead?
Thank you for worrying about my productivity; it's appreciated. That said, I'm almost done with eight more FATE Makefile snippets, so I've got the "stuff that matters" angle covered nicely. Now why don't you just decide which direction to change or tell me to choose either, thus freeing up your and my time to work on stuff that matters? Instead you choose to waste time, bits and energy on replies that lead absolutely nowhere... Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
