Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes: > On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:37:58PM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote: >> Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes: >> > On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:28:30PM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote: >> >> Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 03:25:44AM +0100, Mans Rullgard wrote: >> >> >> --- a/tests/Makefile >> >> >> +++ b/tests/Makefile >> >> >> @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ ENCDEC2 = $(call ALLYES, $(firstword $(1))_ENCODER >> >> >> $(lastword $(1))_DECODER \ >> >> >> $(firstword $(2))_ENCODER $(lastword >> >> >> $(2))_DECODER \ >> >> >> $(firstword $(3))_MUXER $(lastword >> >> >> $(3))_DEMUXER) >> >> >> >> >> >> +DEMDEC = $(call ALLYES, $(1)_DEMUXER $(2:%=%_DECODER)) >> >> > >> >> > Now that I'm working on adding dependencies I keep getting confused by >> >> > the differences in argument order between the macros. ENCDEC/ENCDEC2 >> >> > has (de)muxers before en/decoders, for DEMDEC it is the other way >> >> > around. >> >> > >> >> > I suggest changing ENCDEC/ENCDEC2 to have (de)muxers as first arguments >> >> > as well. >> >> >> >> I suggest you suck it up or complain yesterday. >> > >> > I can still prepare a patch to change it and fix this internal API >> > inconsistency.. We just need to decide which direction to change. >> >> Why don't you work on something that actually matters instead? > > Thank you for worrying about my productivity; it's appreciated. That > said, I'm almost done with eight more FATE Makefile snippets, so I've > got the "stuff that matters" angle covered nicely. > > Now why don't you just decide which direction to change or tell me to > choose either, thus freeing up your and my time to work on stuff that > matters? Instead you choose to waste time, bits and energy on replies > that lead absolutely nowhere...
Why do you insist on changing something? -- Måns Rullgård [email protected] _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
