On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 06:21:45PM +0000, Måns Rullgård wrote: > Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes: > > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 06:13:34PM +0000, Måns Rullgård wrote: > >> Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes: > >> > >> > +FATE_H264_BSF-$(CONFIG_MOV_DEMUXER) += fate-h264-bsf-mp4toannexb > >> > +FATE_H264-$(CONFIG_H264_MP4TOANNEXB_BSF) += $(FATE_H264_BSF-yes) > >> > >> That's a strange way of splitting it. > > > > It's the only test that depends on a BSF. Adding a separate macro for > > a single test feels silly, as does adding a "-yes-yes" value instead of > > a "-yes" value. So the only option seems to be one level of variable > > indirection. Alternative suggestions? > > You could use the ALLYES macro.
lol, of course ... - updated patch coming up ... Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
