On Sat, 01 Dec 2012 12:19:05 +0100
Arjen Vellekoop <[email protected]> wrote:
> And yes I could get a Beagleboard or Pandaboard. That's not the issue in
> my opinion. I already have a working TV server with my desktop computer,
> which is an even faster computer than the forementioned boards. The
> challenge here is to get the library to work with this small board.
> Further, if the library could work with the Openmax Api it would not
> only serve the Raspberry board but all the other hardware that utilizes
> the Openmax Api.
> Or am I overlooking something?
Yes: TOFU is evil! It should be avoided wherever possible[1]
Yes2: libav is an opensource project like others as well. People write
support for something because they think they need it or because its
fun to do. Which basically means, if you want to have support for something
non-trivial, you have to find someone who is interested in it or do it
yourself. And given that most people around libav are usually busy with
lots of stuff that they find very interesting, it will probably be the latter.
Yes3: People around here seem to think that openmax is an overly clumsy,
developed behind closed doors standard. Where the develpopers of said
standard didn't even think about asking those who will be using their
standard until it was too late. The last words i've heard at VDD
about openmax were not very kind.
Attila Kinali
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-posting#Top-posting
--
There is no secret ingredient
-- Po, Kung Fu Panda
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
