Luca Barbato wrote:
????: // those are very lavc-specific, but quite useful so i'm unsure // what to do about them. pkt_pts might potentially be replaced by pts, // since pts is currently not used for anything useful when decoding // but pkt_dts is apparently also useful when there is no pts int64_t pkt_pts; int64_t pkt_dts; int64_t reordered_opaque;I wonder who uses reordered_opaque, the other two have some uses indeed.
I am using it. And I still find it useful to have a way to attach a user provided reference to a frame. _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
