On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 17:28:18 +0100, Vladimir Pantelic <[email protected]> wrote: > Luca Barbato wrote: > > >> ????: > >> // those are very lavc-specific, but quite useful so i'm unsure > >> // what to do about them. pkt_pts might potentially be replaced by > >> pts, > >> // since pts is currently not used for anything useful when > >> decoding > >> // but pkt_dts is apparently also useful when there is no pts > >> int64_t pkt_pts; > >> int64_t pkt_dts; > >> int64_t reordered_opaque; > > > > I wonder who uses reordered_opaque, the other two have some uses indeed. > > I am using it. And I still find it useful to have a way to attach a user > provided > reference to a frame.
I'm considering to do this in side data instead, but I guess i'll keep reordered_opaque for now and deal with the problem later when the dust settles. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
