Hi, On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote: > On 19/01/13 22:08, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: >> THIS PROVES THAT THE CHANGES TO THE FATE RESULT ARE CORRECT >> ALL CHANGES IN THIS PATCH EXCEPT THE FATE REF CHANGES ARE UNDONE IN PATCH 2 > > Everybody on irc knows, and everybody who read your patchset as whole > does, since you didn't --annotate the first patch few that answer patch > by patch are bound to make this mistake, no need to scream at them.
If I have to say the same thing 10x in 3 different mediums, something is wrong. Ronald _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
