On 23/03/13 16:44, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > An alternative to this implementation would be a "--enable-coverage" > switch to the configure switch. TBH, I like my approach better, espc. > given that the proposed patch comes with updates to the developer > documentation, but I seek for opinions what makes more sense.
I prefer not not adding more options (and options that would result in curious effect, such as enabling asan and lcov at the same time and run the resulting binary on valgrind). We might discuss about using something different than --toolchain for asan and friends. lu _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
